Este sitio web fue traducido automáticamente. Para obtener más información, por favor haz clic aquí.

New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote a scathing piece calling out "media groupthink" for dismissing the idea that the coronavirus pandemic began from Wuhan lab leak in China after recent developments gave credence to the theory. 

Stephens began his column Monday by declaring it would be one of "the greatest scientific scandals in history" if the lab-leak theory was true, but that an "actual scandal" involving the media's early rejection of the theory is also in play. 

He took aim at the media critics who slammed Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., for sharing "reasonable observations" about how the Wuhan Virology Lab could be the location of the pandemic's origins.

WASHINGTON POST ISSUES ‘CORRECTION’ ON 2020 TOM COTTON STORY CLAIMING COVID LAB-LEAK THEORY WAS ‘DEBUNKED’

"The overall shape of the media narrative was clear. On one side were experts at places like the World Health Organization: knowledgeable, incorruptible, authoritative, noble. On the other were a bunch of right-wing yahoos pushing a risible fantasy with xenophobic overtones in order to deflect attention from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the crisis," Stephens wrote. "If the lab-leak theory is finally getting the respectful attention it always deserved, it’s mainly because Joe Biden authorized an inquiry and Anthony Fauci admitted to doubts about the natural-origin claim. In other words, the right president and the right public-health expert have blessed a certain line of inquiry."

The Times columnist stressed that the theory was "always credible" regardless if it turns out to be true or not.

"Good journalism, like good science, should follow evidence, not narratives. It should pay as much heed to intelligent gadflies as it does to eminent authorities. And it should never treat honest disagreement as moral heresy," Stephens said. "Anyone wondering why so many people have become so hostile to the pronouncements of public-health officials and science journalists should draw the appropriate conclusion from this story. When lecturing the public about the dangers of misinformation, it’s best not to peddle it yourself."

MEET THE PRESS -- Pictured: (l-r)  Bret Stephens, Columnist, The New York Times; MSNBC Contributor, and Carol Lee, NBC News National Political Reporter appear on "Meet the Press" in Washington, D.C., Sunday, June 17, 2018.   (Photo by: William B. Plowman/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)

MEET THE PRESS -- Pictured: (l-r)  Bret Stephens, Columnist, The New York Times; MSNBC Contributor, and Carol Lee, NBC News National Political Reporter appear on "Meet the Press" in Washington, D.C., Sunday, June 17, 2018.   (Photo by: William B. Plowman/NBC/NBC NewsWire via Getty Images)

Many members of the media have since attempted to spin the recent developments and come up with excuses for dismissing the theory in the first place. 

Associated Press White House reporter Jonathan Lemire accused former President Trump and his allies of "practicing revisionist history," while New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman blamed him and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for casting doubt within the media for withholding evidence to back their claims. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler similarly raised eyebrows for declaring that the theory is "suddenly credible." 

Trump issued a statement last week touting that he was "right" about the virus' origins even though he was "badly criticized" at the time.