Este sitio web fue traducido automáticamente. Para obtener más información, por favor haz clic aquí.
Expand / Collapse search
Watch TV
Menu

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2024 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper.

Tech

Oracle, Google await verdict in $1 billion smartphone lawsuit

By The Wall Street Journal
Published | Updated
  • 9b6b7006-Oracle Google Trial
    Image 1 of 2

    April 18, 2012: Google CEO Larry Page walks into a federal building in San Francisco to testify in a legal battle against Oracle. A day earlier, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison acknowledged he wanted to compete against Android in the smartphone market before deciding instead to sue his potential rival for copyright and patent infringement. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)

  • Oracle Google
    Image 2 of 2

    April 17, 2012: Oracle CEO Larry Ellison arrives for a court appearance at a federal building in San Francisco. Oracle relied heavily on Google's own internal emails to argue Google's top executives knew they were stealing a popular piece of technology to build the Android software. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

SAN FRANCISCO – Oracle and Google closed their respective cases in the copyright portion of an ongoing legal battle over Google's Android mobile phone software Monday, leaving a jury to decide on one half of a high-profile trial over the alleged infringement of Oracle's Java copyrights and patents.

Oracle attorney Michael Jacobs closed his client's copyright case by arguing Google's defense amounted to a series of insufficient excuses for pilfering Java in order to build Android, which has since become the most popular smartphone software platform in the world.

[summary]

"We need the help of the justice system to enforce our intellectual property rights," Jacobs told the jury.

Google attorney Robert Van Nest countered that the Internet search giant merely interpreted a small portion of Java open to public use in order to build the sort of successful mobile software that Oracle and Sun had failed to develop on their own.

More On This...

While Van Nest conceded Google did once have a small amount of proprietary Java code in Android, it was so minimal as to be "not a big deal whatsoever."

Oracle bought Sun and Sun's Java technology in early 2010. Later that year, Oracle sued Google, alleging Android infringes copyrights and patents that protect Java. The companies went to trial in San Francisco earlier this month.

After the jury deliberates over Oracle's copyright claims, the trial will shift to patents. A third, damages phase related to both copyrights and patents could follow as part of a trial expected to last two months.

During his closing argument, Google attorney Van Nest leaned heavily on the testimony of former Sun Chief Executive Jonathan Schwartz, who had said Sun had no grounds to sue Google over Android. Schwartz, as Google's attorneys stressed, publicly praised Android.

Read more on the $1 billion lawsuit at the Wall Street Journal.