Fox News Flash top headlines for April 9
Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com.
- California is struggling to determine whether the $24 billion spent to combat homelessness over the past five years has had any meaningful impact.
- A state audit released Tuesday found that the homeless crisis hasn't improved in many cities.
- The audit also found that the California Interagency Council on Homelessness stopped tracking programs' efficacy in 2021.
California spent $24 billion to tackle homelessness over the past five years but didn’t consistently track whether the huge outlay of public money actually improved the situation, according to state audit released Tuesday.
With makeshift tents lining the streets and disrupting businesses in cities and towns throughout California, homelessness has become one of the most frustrating and seemingly intractable issues in the country's most populous state.
An estimated 171,000 people are homeless in California, which amounts to roughly 30% of all of the homeless people in the U.S.
Despite the roughly $24 billion spent on homeless and housing programs during the 2018-2023 fiscal years, the problem didn’t improve in many cities, according to state auditor's report.
Among other things, the report found that the California Interagency Council on Homelessness, which is responsible for coordinating agencies and allocating resources for homelessness programs, stopped tracking spending on programs and whether programs were working in 2021. It also failed to collect and evaluate outcome data for these programs due to the lack of a consistent method, the audit found.
NextFILE - Homeless people wait in line for dinner outside the Midnight Mission in the Skid Row area of Los Angeles, Wednesday, Oct. 25, 2023. A state audit has found that California spent $24 billion to tackle homelessness over a five year period but didn’t consistently track the outcomes or effectiveness of its programs. The report released Tuesday, April 9, 2024, attempts to assess how effective the state and local cities have been spending billions of dollars to address the ongoing homelessness crisis in California. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)
Some data regarding the number of program participants and bed inventory in the state system might not be accurate or reliable, the audit found.
The council, which lawmakers created in 2017 to help deal with the state's homelessness problem, has only reported on homelessness spending once, according to the audit. Without reliable and recent data on its spending, "the state will continue to lack complete and timely information about the ongoing costs and associated outcomes of its homelessness programs," the report says.
Democratic state Sen. Dave Cortese, who requested the audit last year after touring a large homeless encampment in San Jose, said the audit depicts "a data desert" when it comes to homelessness. The biggest issue is the lack of transparency at every level, he said.
"Despite (the auditor office’s) professionalism and best efforts, they are at this time unable to ... draw conclusions about things like whether or not overhead is appropriate or too high," Cortese said, though he stopped short of calling for a halt to future spending on the homelessness issue.
Republican state Sen. Roger Niello said the lack of accountability is troubling.
"California is facing a concerning paradox: despite an exorbitant amount of dollars spent, the state’s homeless population is not slowing down," Niello said in a statement. "These audit results are a wake-up call for a shift toward solutions that prioritize self-sufficiency and cost effectiveness."
California funds more than 30 programs to tackle homelessness. The audit assessed five initiatives and found that only two of them — one that converts hotel and motel rooms into housing and one that provides housing-related support — are "likely cost-effective."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The state auditor also reviewed homelessness spending in two major cities, San Jose and San Diego, and found that both failed to effectively track revenue and spending due to a lack of spending plans.
More from Politics
