Why Supreme Court ethics legislation is problematic: Carrie Severino
Judicial Crisis Network's Carrie Severino weighs in on the debate over Supreme Court oversight on 'Sunday Night In America.'
Democrats in the Senate have announced the next step in their ethics investigation of the U.S. Supreme Court, which was prompted after investigative reports found some justices enjoyed benefits that some suggested could have influenced their decisions on cases.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin announced on X, formerly Twitter, that he was seeking the ability to subpoena Harlan Crow, Leonard Leo and Robin Arkley II as the investigation moves into its "next step." Crow and Arkley are wealthy Republican donors, and Leo is an activist that has also been tied to gifts given to Supreme Court justices.
"The Supreme Court is in an ethical crisis of its own making," Durbin, D-Ill., said on Monday. "In order to adequately address this crisis, it is imperative that we understand the full extent of how people with interests before the Court are able to use undisclosed gifts to gain private access to the justices."
"The inquiries the Committee has sent to Harlan Crow, Leonard Leo, and Robin Arkley are critical to this work," the Democrat continued.
SENATE DEMS DEMAND CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS OPEN INVESTIGATION INTO CLARENCE THOMAS OVER 'MISCONDUCT'
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Richard Durbin, D-Ill., joined other Democrats in announcing the next step in their ethics investigation of the U.S. Supreme Court. (Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images)
In the statement, Durbin claimed Crow, Arkley, and Leo have "either refused to comply or offered to produce certain limited information that fell well short of what the Committee needs and to which it is entitled."
The Senate Judiciary Committee was then "forced to seek compulsory process" to obtain additional information, Durbin said.
REPORT ON CLARENCE THOMAS' TRAVEL HABITS IS ‘POLITICS PLAIN AND SIMPLE’: EXPERT
The Democrat credited the current Senate investigations with reports over the spring and summer that revealed some Supreme Court justices enjoyed gifts that were not publicly disclosed.
"Thanks to investigative reporting, we now know that for decades, some justices have been joining billionaires with business before the Court on their private planes and yachts or receiving gifts such as private school tuition for a family member," Durbin said. "And it is through this reporting that we learned the justices have not been disclosing these gifts as required by federal laws that expressly apply to them."
(Front to back, L-R) Official photo of Supreme Court justices – Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Samuel Alito and Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. (OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)
"By accepting these lavish, undisclosed gifts, the justices have enabled their wealthy benefactors and other individuals with business before the Court to gain private access to the justices while preventing public scrutiny of this conduct," the Democrat continued.
Documents revealed over the summer showed Crow paid for trips and bought property from Justices Clarence Thomas while Leo and Arkley organized and paid for a trip for Justice Samuel Alito.
Some Republicans have decried the Supreme Court investigations as efforts to delegitimize the court, cast doubt on its rulings or to allow President Biden to potentially replace justices on the bench. (Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
He also took a swipe at Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, saying he "could fix this problem today and adopt a binding code of conduct."
Roberts has been a frequent target of criticism and Democrats have demanded he investigate his fellow justices.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"As long as he refuses to act, the Judiciary Committee will," Durbin concluded.
Some Republicans have decried the Supreme Court investigations as efforts to delegitimize the court, cast doubt on its rulings or to allow President Biden to potentially replace justices on the bench.
Leo responded to Durbin's move in an October 19 letter he says the senator "never acknowledged." The letter argues that Durbin has engaged in First Amendment retaliation against Leo and others, and lays out Leo's reasons for refusing to cooperate.
"I will not bow to the vile and disgusting liberal McCarthyism, that seeks to destroy the Supreme Court simply because it follows the constitution rather than their political agenda," Leo told Fox News Digital in a statement.
Crow also released a statement criticizing Durbin and the committee.
"It’s disappointing that one party on the Committee would choose to pursue an unnecessary, partisan, and politically motivated subpoena instead of simply reciprocating Mr. Crow’s good faith efforts at a reasonable compromise that respects both sides. We offered extensive information responsive to the Committee’s requests despite the serious constitutional and privacy concerns presented to the Committee, which were ignored and remain unaddressed," Crow told Fox News Digital.
More from Politics
